Saturday, September 5, 2015

Quagmire

The recent conflict in the West Michigan Conference of the United Methodist Church, regarding the departure of certified candidate for ministry Ginny Mikita, has generated a firestorm of Facebook chatter, not to mention comment in the secular press. I don't pretend to know more than anyone else, but because of an administrative role, I've been in a relatively small loop that has been dealing with this. I am bound, like others, to confidentiality. Therefore, I will not disclose information I believe to be privately guarded by our covenant and by responsibility. That said, I will say this, to be read along with other Facebook comments following a post by Paul Hillman of the Reconciling Ministries Network: 

"Excommunicated" is probably not the right word, although I suspect it accurately reflects the impact of Ginny's experience for her. The UMC does not excommunicate people in the strict sense. We are one of the most administratively bogged down organizations on the planet, and General Conference would never settle for a word that has very specific application in another Christian organization (my opinion). The problem at hand is the interpretation of our Discipline paragraph 241, which, in the reading of some, is designed to give direction to pastors and membership secretaries when removing a church member because of their choice to unite with another church or denomination, without notifying the former pastor of their congregation. Although I haven't spoken with Ginny about this, from what I've read I don't believe it was her choice to withdraw from UMC membership. So I question whether the use of 241 is appropriate for Ginny's case. Another Discipline paragraph to use might be 314, which deals with certified candidates (Ginny's status). Because she was a certified candidate in process with our system, she was more than a church member. She was part of our covenant of clergy who are bound at a different level together. If the direction given in paragraph 314 were followed, Ginny would have had an orderly, methodical process to follow, with less confusion (though still some) and hopefully less hurt. She may have technically "voluntarily withdrawn" her membership when she got ordained in the ULC (a non-denomination by the way, the credentials of which would never be acceptable if Ginny were coming to the UMC from that church - but that's another issue) however I believe it was not her intention, and there's the rub. I don't know how I would have reacted had I been in the shoes of a bishop or district superintendent. I believe it is still in our best interests, not to mention wise, to respect their position and the likelihood that they were compelled to apply an interpretation of the Discipline that by all indications they do not personally support. A friend has recently reminded me of the words of Matthew 9:13:  "I desire mercy, not sacrifice." I believe those words are meant to be applied across the board, not selectively.  Finally, we have gotten ourselves into an impossible quagmire caused by a legal application of our rules, when our covenant could have been the guiding principal. The Discipline, like the Ten Commandments, the Sermon on the Mount, and some of Paul's words, is intended to govern with mercy, not sacrifice. So, so sad.  
https://www.facebook.com/RMNetwork/photos/a.10150664537194483.406597.14169974482/10153590435404483/?type=1